Shane Schmidt
No reply on file from Shane Schmidt on this matter.
Claims entered
No claim has been entered on this docket.
1 filed · 1 on the record. The chronology below carries every filing, docket event and outcome — open a row there for its source.
Open to posting — anyone may add to this file, subject to the review queue.
The chronology
Gov, Institution and Public name who produced a document; Event marks a thing that happened, not a document.
1 entry of another class is hidden by this filter — show every class.
By when it happened. Rows with no date on their face are shown as undated, not guessed. Hover, focus or tap a row for its full detail.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 26588 / July 17, 2026 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nelson Gomes et al. , No. 20-cv-11092 (D. Mass. filed June 9, 2020) SEC Obtains Final Consent Judgment as to Individual in Alleged Microcap Fraud Scheme On July 17, 2026, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts entered a final consent judgment as to Shane Schmidt in a previously-filed action against 11 defendants alleging a fraudulent microcap scheme. The Commission’s complaint , filed on June 9, 2020, alleged that Schmidt engaged with others in a fraudulent scheme to dump the securities of a microcap company, Sandy Steele Unlimited, Inc. According to the complaint, Schmidt used an alias to secretly operate Sandy Steele and created a false and misleading company website. Schmidt allegedly facilitated the distribution of Sandy Steele shares to his associates who then allegedly sold the shares during a false and misleading promotional campaign. Schmidt consented to the entry of a final judgment enjoining him from violating the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a)(1) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, ordering him to pay $15,802 in disgorgement, which is deemed satisfied by the forfeiture judgment imposed against Schmidt in a parallel criminal case, United States v. Schmidt , No. 25-cr-10046 (D. Mass), and imposing a penny stock bar against him. The Court previously entered judgments by consent against defendants Douglas Roe, Kelly Warawa, Nelson Gomes, Michael Luckhoo-Bouche, and Atlantean Management Corporation and judgments by default against FFS Capital Limited, Paifang Trading Limited, Artefactor Limited, Meadow Asia Limited, and Thyme International Limited. The SEC’s litigation, which is now complete, was handled by Kathleen Shields in the SEC’s Boston Regional Office. Resources <ul class="field
No crime on the record yet.
No statutes on the record yet.
No place on the record yet.
No status on the record yet.
No parties on the record yet.
"Schmidt consented to the entry of a final judgment enjoining him from violating the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a)(1) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, ordering him to pay $15,802 in disgorgement, which is deemed satisfied by the forfeiture judgment imposed against Schmidt in a parallel criminal case, United States v."