.org
Searching:
§ Named party · No finding entered
Jai Sondhi
person
Full registry record
CLASS ACTION JX-SEC-LR-26542Opened AUG 21 2026Quick look

Jai Sondhi

Where this class action stands
Stage 5 of 7 · Filed
organizing · next rung: Resolved
§ Right of reply

No reply on file from Jai Sondhi on this matter.

Claims entered

No claim has been entered on this docket.

1 filed · 1 on the record. The chronology below carries every filing, docket event and outcome — open a row there for its source.

Open to posting — anyone may add to this file, subject to the review queue.

The chronology

Gov, Institution and Public name who produced a document; Event marks a thing that happened, not a document.

By when it happened. Rows with no date on their face are shown as undated, not guessed. Hover, focus or tap a row for its full detail.

Docket event

Opened at stage filed

Entered on the record AUG 21 2026Occurred AUG 21 2026
APR 29 '26GovJai SondhiSEC
Filing

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 26542 / April 29, 2026 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jai Sondhi, No. 3:26-cv-01357 (N.D. Tex. filed Apr. 28, 2026) SEC Files Settled Insider Trading Action Against Texas CPA and Former Internal Audit Head of Public Company On April 28, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a settled action against Jai Sondhi, a licensed CPA in Texas and the former Senior Director of Internal Audit and Controls at Canoo, Inc., for allegedly engaging in insider trading. According to the SEC’s complaint, in June 2022, Sondhi learned during internal meetings that Canoo was on the verge of entering into a major contract with a prominent retailer for Canoo to sell the retailer thousands of electric vehicles. The complaint alleges that Sondhi purchased Canoo common stock and call options in late June and early July 2022, while aware of this material nonpublic information and despite Sondhi knowing that company policy prohibited him from doing so. As further alleged, on July 12, 2022, Canoo publicly announced the transaction with the retailer, and its stock price increased 53%, resulting in ill-gotten gains to Sondhi totaling $54,965.23. The SEC’s complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, charges Sondhi with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint, Sondhi consented to the entry of a final judgment, subject to court approval, in which he agreed to be permanently enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and to pay disgorgement of $54,965.23, plus prejudgment interest of $15,969.28, and a civil penalty of $54,965.23. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Joseph Zambuto, Jr., and supervised by Charles J. Felker and Pei Y. Chung with the assistance of Kevin John Byrne, Christopher Carney, David A. Nasse, and James Connor. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Resources <ul class="field

Entered on the record AUG 21 2026Occurred APR 29 2026Producer: SEChttps://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26542Entered by fnulnu
On the record
Crime

No crime on the record yet.

Statutes

No statutes on the record yet.

Place
Texas

"The SEC’s complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, charges Sondhi with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder."

Status
Case 3:26-cv-01357

"Jai Sondhi, No. 3:26-cv-01357 (N.D."

Parties

No parties on the record yet.

Amounts
$15,969.28 Penalty

"Without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint, Sondhi consented to the entry of a final judgment, subject to court approval, in which he agreed to be permanently enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and to pay disgorgement of $54,965.23, plus prejudgment interest of $15,969.28, and a civil penalty of $54,965.23."

$54,965.23 Penalty

"Without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint, Sondhi consented to the entry of a final judgment, subject to court approval, in which he agreed to be permanently enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and to pay disgorgement of $54,965.23, plus prejudgment interest of $15,969.28, and a civil penalty of $54,965.23."