Ian G. Bell
No reply on file from Ian G. Bell on this matter.
Claims entered
No claim has been entered on this docket.
1 filed · 1 on the record. The chronology below carries every filing, docket event and outcome — open a row there for its source.
Open to posting — anyone may add to this file, subject to the review queue.
The chronology
Gov, Institution and Public name who produced a document; Event marks a thing that happened, not a document.
1 entry of another class is hidden by this filter — show every class.
By when it happened. Rows with no date on their face are shown as undated, not guessed. Hover, focus or tap a row for its full detail.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 26488 / February 24, 2026 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ian G. Bell , No. 24-cv-03403 (D. Colo. filed Dec. 9, 2024) SEC Obtains Final Consent Judgment as to Denver Day-Trader Charged with Defrauding Investors On February 23, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado entered a final consent judgment as to Ian G. Bell in the SEC’s civil enforcement action that charged Bell in connection with an alleged fraudulent day-trading scheme. According to the SEC’s complaint , Bell, between July 2020 and March 2023, fraudulently raised more than $1.3 million from at least 29 investors by lying to investors about his trading performance, including by sending fabricated account performance screenshots. The complaint further alleged that Bell lost or squandered nearly all of the investors’ money, misappropriated investor money for his personal use, and, to conceal his fraud, lied about his plans and ability to repay investors. Without admitting or denying the allegations, Bell consented to entry of the final judgment that permanently enjoins him from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, permanently enjoins him from participating in the issuance, purchase, offer, or sale of any securities except for his own personal account, and orders him to pay disgorgement of $339,848.84, plus prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $98,570.64, with these amounts deemed satisfied by the forfeiture order entered in the parallel criminal case United States v. Bell , No. 24-cr-00345-PAB (D. Colo. filed Dec. 3, 2024). The SEC’s litigation against Bell was conducted by Jodanna Haskins and Ty Cottrill and supervised by Gregory Kasper and Nicholas Heinke, all of the SEC’s Denver Regional Office. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Mr. Cottrill and supervised by Mr. Heinke. Resources <ul class="field
No crime on the record yet.
No statutes on the record yet.
No place on the record yet.
"Colo. filed Dec. 9, 2024) SEC Obtains Final Consent Judgment as to Denver Day-Trader Charged with Defrauding Investors On February 23, 2026, the U.S."
No parties on the record yet.
"Without admitting or denying the allegations, Bell consented to entry of the final judgment that permanently enjoins him from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, permanently enjoins him from participating in the issuance, purchase, offer, or sale of any securities except for his own personal account, and orders him to pay disgorgement of $339,848.84, plus prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $98,570.64, with these amounts deemed satisfied by the forfeiture order entered in the parallel criminal case United States v."