.org
Searching:
§ Named party · No finding entered
Marat Likhtenstein
person
Full registry record
CLASS ACTION JX-SEC-LR-26476Opened AUG 21 2026Quick look

Marat Likhtenstein

Where this class action stands
Stage 5 of 7 · Filed
organizing · next rung: Resolved
§ Right of reply

No reply on file from Marat Likhtenstein on this matter.

Claims entered

No claim has been entered on this docket.

1 filed · 1 on the record. The chronology below carries every filing, docket event and outcome — open a row there for its source.

Open to posting — anyone may add to this file, subject to the review queue.

The chronology

Gov, Institution and Public name who produced a document; Event marks a thing that happened, not a document.

By when it happened. Rows with no date on their face are shown as undated, not guessed. Hover, focus or tap a row for its full detail.

Docket event

Opened at stage filed

Entered on the record AUG 21 2026Occurred AUG 21 2026
FEB 05 '26GovMarat LikhtensteinSEC
Filing

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 26476 / February 5, 2026 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Marat Likhtenstein , No. 25-civ-05412 (E.D.N.Y. filed Sept. 26, 2025) SEC Charges Marat Likhtenstein in Connection with $4 Million Offering Fraud On September 26, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed charges against Marat Likhtenstein for perpetrating an offering fraud scheme primarily targeting the Russian-American Jewish community. According to the SEC’s complaint, from at least April 2017 through June 2024, Likhtenstein, while acting as an investment adviser, solicited, recommended, and sold self-issued investments in the form of promissory notes that raised more than $4.1 million from at least 15 advisory clients. Likhtenstein falsely told his clients, many of whom were elderly, that if they purchased promissory notes from him through his “side business,” they would earn extraordinary interest rates through investments in highly lucrative business opportunities and deals. However, as the complaint alleges, Likhtenstein did not actually invest the investors' funds. Instead, he allegedly misappropriated their funds by making $940,000 in Ponzi-like payments to other investors and by spending almost $3.2 million on his personal expenses. The SEC's complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, charges Likhtenstein with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The complaint seeks a final judgment ordering Likhtenstein to pay disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties, as well as enjoining him from violating the charged provisions and imposing conduct-based injunctions. Likhtenstein, without admitting or denying the allegations, consented to a bifurcated settlement, agreeing to the injunctive relief, with monetary relief to be determined at a later date. On February 4, 2026, the Court entered the consent judgment. On March 12, 2025, Likhtenstein was charged in a parallel criminal action brought by the Kings County District Attorney’s Office. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by John C. Lehmann, Natallia Krauchuk, Patricia Schrage, Jacqueline A. Fine, and Lindsay S. Moilanen under the supervision of Mark R. Sylvester of the New York Regional Office. The litigation will be led by Ms. Krauchuk and Hayden M. Brockett under the supervision of Jack Kaufman. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Kings County District Attorney’s Office. Resources <ul class="field

Entered on the record AUG 21 2026Occurred FEB 05 2026Producer: SEChttps://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26476Entered by fnulnu
On the record
Crime

No crime on the record yet.

Statutes

No statutes on the record yet.

Place
New York

"District Court for the Eastern District of New York, charges Likhtenstein with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940."

Status

No status on the record yet.

Parties

No parties on the record yet.

Amounts

No amounts on the record yet.